Being HIV+ = You’re a Bioterrorist

At least, that’s the case in Michigan, where an HIV positive man has been charged with assault and being in possession of a “harmful device.”  In this case, HIV is the “bioterror weapon” in question.

The charges come after a physical altercation between Daniel Allen and his neighbor.  Allen alleges that his neighbors have been harassing him for years because he is gay:

For years, Allen says, the Fernandis family has routinely called him “faggot,” and harassed him. Family and friends say they have witnessed this behavior on several occasions. Allen brought two people with him to court who claim to have heard Fernandis make anti-gay remarks to Allen on more than one occasion. In at least one instance, the police may have been involved.

While Fernandis wrote in his police statement that he approached Allen that day and Allen “hugged up” to him, and began biting Fernandis, Allen says, in fact, it was Fernandis who started the violence.

Allen alleges the younger Fernandis stormed up to him, spitting.

“He got up in my face, I mean right up in my face,” Allen says, placing his hand just in front of his nose. “Then he chest bumps me. He grabbed me here,” he says indicating his rib cage, “and I started scratching at his face. He picked me up and threw me on the ground on my back.”

At that point, Allen alleges, Fernandis was joined by his wife Denise and their son and all three were assaulting him at the same time. Fernandis’ father broke the fight up.

Regardless of who started this particular fight, it’s incredibly shitty of them to say that HIV is a form of bioterrorism.  It’s just astoundingly ignorant.  It’s also the first case of its kind, so it will be setting a precedent.  Sigh.

Advertisements

About Melissa

I love donuts. Chocolate iced, hold the sprinkles.
This entry was posted in US news, whatthefuckery and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Being HIV+ = You’re a Bioterrorist

  1. Julian says:

    If we’re going to go THERE, as a society…….

    Then aren’t all heterosexually active men “bioterrorists” the forms of HPV that cause cervical cancer in women, if such men either rape women or coerce women into having genital sexual intercourse without a condom–or any other form of sex that allows for the virus to be spread–including a man touching his own genital fluids and then touching her genitals (that’s all it takes). Or any man who welcomes the opportunity to do so by woman?

    We know the raper is a terrorist, regardless. But any man that carries the strains of HPV that cause cervical cancer who have the kinds of sexual contact that allow women (with cervixes) to contract this STI/STD, is putting a woman or women’s lives at risk.

    So if we’re going to go THERE, let’s not discriminate and leave out all that straight men do to spread lethal (to women) STIs/STDs.

  2. Julian says:

    My apologies for the confusion and lack of completion of thought in the first paragraph just above.

    It ought to read:

    Then aren’t all heterosexually active men “bioterrorists” if they carry the forms of HPV that cause cervical cancer in women, if such men either rape women or coerce women into having genital sexual intercourse without a condom–or any other form of sex that allows for the virus to be spread–including a man touching his own genital fluids and then touching her genitals (that’s all it takes). Or any man who welcomes the opportunity to do so by any woman with a cervix who is not aware he has such strains of HPV?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s