Supreme Court rules against Arizona school district in strip search case


I’ve been following this case since I first heard about then-13-year-old Savana Redding’s forced strip search at school.  Redding was accused of having pills in her undergarments (The hard drugs in question? Prescription-strength Ibuprofen, which is equivalent to two Advils).  Acting on no other evidence but another student’s claim, the school then forced Redding to strip so that they could search her undergarments.

Today, everyone except Clarence Thomas ruled that Redding’s 4th Amendment rights had been violated.  Justice Souter wrote:

“In sum, what was missing from the suspected facts that pointed to Savana was any indication of danger to the students from the power of the drugs or their quantity, and any reason to suppose that Savana was carrying pills in her underwear,” the court said. “We think that the combination of these deficiencies was fatal to finding the search reasonable.”


About Melissa

I love donuts. Chocolate iced, hold the sprinkles.
This entry was posted in body politics, human rights and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s